Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someone
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someone
Photo via Shutterstock
Photo via Shutterstock

One of the creepiest and most violating trends of the computer age must be outlawed throughout the five boroughs, according to Queens City Councilman Rory Lancman.

Along with Manhattan City Councilman Dan Garodnick, the Hillcrest-based Lancman announced on April 6 legislation that would criminalize “revenge porn,” the release of nude or sexually graphic imagery of someone without their consent through the Internet or social media. Lancman called it “a 21st century form of sexual assault” used to humiliate and embarrass individuals.

“Distributing intimate images or videos of another person on the Internet without consent is an appalling breach of privacy that can have devastating consequences for victims,” Lancman said. “It is critically important for the laws in New York City to catch up with our technology to provide protections for New Yorkers from such abuse.”

The proposed legislation is modeled after a state bill sponsored by Bayside-based Assemblyman Ed Braunstein that would make revenge porn a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year behind bars and/or a $1,000 fine.

City Councilman Rory Lancman addresses an April 6 press conference at City Hall. (photo courtesy of City Councilman Lancman’s office)

Lancman’s bill, which was introduced in September 2016, has the support of two other Queens City Councilmen: Daniel Dromm and Donovan Richards.

“Many lives have been lost because of [revenge porn],” Dromm said. “Revenge porn has been used to humiliate and coerce LGBTQ people for as long as recording devices have existed. … Our city’s most marginalized, particularly our youth, will be greatly protected by this legislation.”

“Weak-minded bullies in New York City who resort to these methods to reveal personal and intimate photos and videos violate trust, decency and privacy,” Richards added. “There is no reason that these acts should not violate the law.”

The City Council’s Public Safety Committee was scheduled to consider the legislation at its April 6 hearing. If it clears the committee, the bill must then be passed by the full City Council and signed by the mayor in order to become law.

If enacted, the provisions in the legislation would take effect immediately.

Comments:

Join The Discussion



Profile picture
UTOMI HAIDOME April 07, 2017 / 07:43AM
This rikers issue of closure is unbelievable. U are incarcerated so, whose fault? If u don't want to be treated as stipulated,then keep out of crimes. You advocating for these murderers, rapist, kidnappers as if that is all that matters. A criminal should be treated as such for peace to reign and next time will stay out of trouble. If u are relocating them, some I suggest should be very close to where all the key players to move resides. Over ten thousand inmates is no ten persons with high profile cases. The best like some suggestions made is to fix the problems at rikers and not moving. Think again of the money involved in construction and movement. Penny wise pounds foolish. Be wish government.
Reply

Related Stories
No Image
Tech tips for college-bound students and their parents
No Image
Money-saving, laptop-buying tips for back-to-school shoppers
Popular Stories
Photo courtesy of NYPD
UPDATE: Cops describe two suspects who broke into six businesses along Bell Boulevard in Bayside
Photos by Suzanne Monteverdi/QNS
'We respect our properties': Whitestone residents voice concerns with long-abandoned house
Photo via Shutterstock
Queens housing market is one of the least affordable in the U.S., study finds


Skip to toolbar