Did you know that the government is putting toxic chemicals in our water which come from the scrubbing systems of the fertilizer industry and are classified as “hazardous wastes” (sodium fluorosilicate and fluorosilicic acid). Are you concerned? You should be. Unfortunately, when these chemicals are called “fluoride,” safety concerns go down the drain.
There is a growing body of evidence that suggests fluoride does more harm than good.
One of the most useful is “50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation,” by Dr. Paul Connett (www.slwebb.org), where the sources for much of the medical information I used can be found. Most recently, a study published by the National Institute of Environmental Health on December 17 linked fluoride in water, at lower levels than what the EPA considers “safe,” to lower IQ in children.
While four out of five dentists may be enough to pick a gum, ALL should agree before we force-medicate the public, a practice which many, including myself, would oppose under almost any circumstance.
Fluoride is a toxic substance which accumulates in our bones and tissues throughout our lives. Only 50 percent of it is excreted. While all poisons have “safe” levels, common sense dictates it is impossible to monitor fluoride intake in individuals when it is in almost everything we eat and drink, and the amount of water and food people ingest varies widely.
A 2008 report prepared for Congress by the Congressional Research Service concluded the allowable amounts of fluoride should be lowered in order to prevent children from developing severe enamel fluorosis and reduce the lifetime accumulation of fluoride in bone which “is likely to put individuals at greater risk of bone fracture and possibly skeletal fluorosis.” This finding has been ignored.
Proponents of fluoride admit it is deadly at certain levels — one teaspoonful can kill an adult — but maintain that its effectiveness at fighting tooth decay offsets any potential harm. However, studies prove that tooth decay has decreased in areas without water fluoridation at the same levels as areas that fluoridate. Additionally, in areas and countries that have discontinued fluoridation, dental decay has actually decreased. The main reason for this is, as the Center for Disease Control has now acknowledged, any benefits from fluoride are topical. Fluoride toothpastes are effective and are not meant to be swallowed (because of the fluoride).
Since I recently introduced my legislation to ban fluoridation, The New York Daily News wants to put a “tinfoil hat” on me, while the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) had called me “hysterical,” “bizarre and unscientific” and stated that “the evidence of diminished I.Q. may best be observed among certain city Council Members.”
More importantly, since my proposed law, the government just released studies confirming the harm caused by ingesting fluoride and recommending that allowable levels be decreased to an amount lower than what exists in NYC water right now!
The government, and industry funded hacks like the ACSH, cannot now admit they were wrong – because of the huge potential liability – so this is their first step toward a future elimination of this toxin.
Expect soon to read a government release saying that fluoride is being removed because of the huge costs involved, and the fact that we can all get enough of it from other sources. There will be no admission of fault, nor any apology to the growing chorus of those "hysterical" voices which tried to protect the public.
Even the union representing the scientists at EPA headquarters has said, “The toxicity of fluoride is so great and the purported benefits . . . are so small – if there are any at all – that requiring every man, woman and children in America to ingest it borders on criminal behavior.”
It’s time for an intelligent discussion to be had on this controversial practice. I believe after that occurs, most people will support NYC using the “Precautionary Principle,” which says, if in doubt, leave it out.
