Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someone
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someone
Photo courtesy of Weprin's office
(from l. to r.) Councilman Barry Grodenchik, Corey Bearak of KeepNYCFree.com, Queens Civic Congress President Kevin Forrestal, Assemblyman David Weprin, Harbachan Singh of the Queens Civic Congress, Arthur Miller of the Trucking Association of New York, Councilman I. Daneek Miller, Zach Miller, and Bob Friedrich of Glen Oaks Village Co-Op join to express opposition to congestion pricing.

Civic leaders and lawmakers from eastern Queens traveled on a rainy Sunday morning to Long Island City to announce their staunch opposition to any congestion pricing tax that could be burdensome for their constituents traveling to and from Manhattan.

Assemblyman David Weprin and City Councilmen Barry Grodenchik and Daneek Miller were joined by the Queens Civic Congress, Trucking Association of New York,Keep NYC Free, and concerned outer-borough residents for the Dec. 16 press conference Dec. 16 25-01 Queens Plaza North, near the entrance to the Ed Koch-Queensboro Bridge.

The congestion pricing plan, introduced by Governor Andrew Cuomo’s Fix NYC Task Force in January, aims to alleviate traffic on Manhattan streets and provide the ailing subway system with much needed cash. The plan, which will begin in 2020, calls for an $11.52 charge for cars entering parts of Manhattan, plus surcharges for taxis, for-hire vehicles, and an heftier $25.34 for trucks.

Weprin believes the congestion tax would be disastrous for Queens, Brooklyn, and Long Island residents, as it would cost commuters hundreds of dollars in additional expenses each month.

“It would raise the cost of doing business with the cost of congestion taxing being passed onto businesses,” said Weprin. “It would raise the cost of consumer goods, with business passing along extra costs to consumers. It would limit the competitive ability of these local small businesses; and it would impose a monetary barrier to Manhattan for outer borough residents, who often travel to the city to visit a doctor, watch a show or enjoy a night out in Manhattan.”

“New York cannot burden the backs of these outer borough working and middle class residents, already struggling with the rising costs of living with a new congestion tax,” he added.

Assemblyman David Weprin speaks to members of the press in Long Island City on Dec. 16 (Photo by Bruce Adler)

Weprin said that the state and city governments must find alternative funding streams to boost public transportation improvements, including the restoration of a commuter tax, an increase in the gas cap, and tax revenue from marijuana legalization.

In Southeast Queens, where there isn’t a multitude of accessible transit options for his constituents, Miller said his community shouldn’t be forced to pay what he believes to be a regressive and burdensome tax.

“When programs such as the reduced fare LIRR Atlantic ticket offer viable alternatives that actually benefit outer borough residents,” said Miller. “Transportation is the great equalizer between communities, but there is no equity to be gained from congestion pricing.”

Grodenchik agreed, stating that there are alternatives that can be explored which will not disproportionately impacted communities and residents of Eastern Queens.

Corey Bearak, senior policy advisor with Keep NYC Congestion Tax Free, said the congestion tax represents an ideological-driven attempt at social engineering which would limit the ability of New York City’s middle class and working families to midtown and downtown Manhattan every work day. 

“It makes better sense to replace this regressive scheme and its limited and unsustainable revenues with sound measures identified by Keep NYC Free, including charging market rate for street closures ($600 million), registration fees ($300 million) and non-resident income tax ($2 billion),” said Bearak. “These would better serve the public and transit needs.”

Comments:

Join The Discussion



Profile picture
AL December 18, 2018 / 02:19PM
There is nothing new here. The the manhattan centric city has been trying to extort money from the other boros for years. I can see if it's only for hire vehicles and trucks which double park and cause the most congestion and wear out the streets, but not ordinary passenger cars heading for medical appointments, shopping, and broadway matinees in manhattan.
Reply

Related Stories
Eastern Queens lawmakers slam latest congestion pricing plan as undue ‘burden’ on residents
Eastern Queens lawmakers slam latest congestion pricing plan as undue ‘burden’ on residents
No Image
Queens Civic Congress is opposed to any plans to put tolls on free East River crossings
Popular Stories
Beloved Terrace Diner closes its doors at Bayside shopping center after 20 years in business
Bayside resident cites quality of life issue and 'horrific' odors stemming from neighboring 'hoarder'
Slashings, silly string and belt-beatings: Terrible trio on a rampage in Sunnyside and Long Island City (UPDATED)


Skip to toolbar